UK ministers have the “false impression” that solar power no longer requires financial support for deployment in the UK.
That’s “deeply worrying”, according to the Solar Trade Association (STA) and Lightsource, with reference to statements made by Energy Minister Lord Bourne who gave evidence to the Energy and Climate Change Committee (ECC) last month.
In a letter to ECC Chair Angus MacNeil, STA quotes Lord Bourne as saying: ‘We are withdrawing subsidy where it is not necessary and the evidence is that costs for a lot of these, certainly solar, are coming down very steeply.
“So if these things are happening without subsidy and Lightsource, which is the largest solar company in the country, on its website say they are installing solar without subsidy in 2016… if we can do these things without subsidy, why on earth would we pay subsidy?’
An attached letter from Lightsource to Energy Secretary Amber Rudd explains subsidy-free installations “can only be viable in niche applications”.
CEO Nick Boyle states: “We have stated publicly that Lightsource is close to building subsidy-free solar in the UK. However it should be noted that this statement currently only applies to projects that are directly connected to the company that uses the generated electricity through a ‘private wire connection’.
“I would be grateful, therefore, if your department would only use Lightsource as an exemplar of subsidy-free solar provision on private wire projects.”
He adds Lightsource will not be able to grow the UK’s solar generation capacity without subsidy on non-private wire projects in 2016.
DECC said the “impressive growth” in the industry has exceeded expectations and the costs of domestic solar systems have falled by around two-thirds since 2010.
A spokesperson added: “Our priority is to keep energy bills as low as possible for hardworking families and businesses whilst supporting low carbon technologies that represent value for money.
“We continue to support the low carbon sector but this needs to be driven by competition and innovation, not subsidies. As the cost of technologies comes down so should the consumer-funded support.”